Growing the business
– Is it required? And why you need a sound pricing strategy
Why does a business need to grow? The question might sound very fundamental,
but most
of us in our personal lives want to settle and take it easy after sometime
(read 35+ years of age), especially when the going is good. It’s not uncommon
to notice this complacency in businesses as well, especially when the numbers
are being met and everything looks seemingly good.
History has shown many businesses get into the comfort zone
and are soon displaced by new technology, changing market needs, changing
environment etc. (Kodak, Nokia, Kingfisher Airlines are some names that come to
my mind).
Thus growth is essential to business sustenance, being
status quo means you are complacent and the end is near!! (That might sound a
little extreme).
Given that growth is an absolute necessity, what options
does a business have to grow?
a. Expand
geographies
b. Enter
new verticals
c. Have
better channels and distribution
d. Make
new products that provide more value
e. New
business model
Most of the above options require an additional spend in
terms of Sales & Administration costs or R&D costs. Thus while
increased sales are good, they are not sufficient if the profit margins remain
flat, or only marginally grow. In the below example, I assumed certain
fictitious numbers, note that the gross margin remains the same. The op margin
depends on the SG&A and R&D costs, if they marginally increase or decrease,
the op margin changes accordingly.
Key Takeaway – Margins don’t change a lot by only increasing
sales.
|
Current Sales
|
Increased Sales
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100
|
200
|
|
COGS
|
75
|
150
|
|
Gross Margin
|
25
|
50 (25%)
|
|
SG&A
|
17
|
32
|
|
R&D
|
4
|
6
|
|
Op Income
|
4 (4%)
|
12 (5%)
|
Option 1 – Reduce
Costs
By reducing costs – this typically translates to value
engineering in engineering/product development firms. Let’s assume we are able
to achieve a 10% reduction in costs
|
Current Sales
|
Current Sales at reduced costs
|
Increased Sales
|
Increased Sales at reduced costs
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100
|
100
|
200
|
200
|
|
COGS
|
75
|
67.5
|
150
|
135
|
|
Gross Margin
|
25
|
32.5
|
50 (25%)
|
65(32.5%)
|
|
SG&A
|
17
|
17
|
32
|
32
|
|
R&D
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
|
Op Income
|
4 (4%)
|
11.5 (11.5%)
|
12 (5%)
|
27(13.5%)
|
Here we can see that a 10% reduction in cost results in
almost a 7% -8%, increase in op margins. This is assuming no extra effort is
spend by R&D, Sales in value engineering.
The first step businesses take is controlling costs, hiring
freezes, travel freeze, reduced benefits etc. It’s a quick measure to keep the
margins even when sales are dipping. However this is a short term measure, in
the long run, beyond a certain point you can do much to control costs without
it impacting your sales.
For e.g. new products pipeline might dry up due to
controlled costs on hiring, R&D. Sales and channel reach might reduced to
reduced spend on sales and marketing activities.
Thus, while cost control is a good short term measure, it
will have long term implications if sustained for too long. Of course, cutting
flamboyance from the system in a long term basis is always sustainable.
Option 2 – Increase
Price
If it is possible to increase the price by 10%, then it has
tremendous impact on the bottom line. Refer to the illustration below.
|
Current Sales
|
Current Sales at increased price (10%)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100
|
110
|
|
COGS
|
75
|
75
|
|
Gross Margin
|
25
|
35
|
|
SG&A
|
17
|
17
|
|
R&D
|
4
|
4
|
|
Op Income
|
4 (4%)
|
14 (19%)
|
A s illustrated, a good pricing can result in a direct
translation to the bottom line accentuating the need for a good pricing
strategy.
To summarize, a business needs to look at ways to improve
top line(revenue) and bottom line( margins) to stay in the game and be ahead of
competition.
In the next post I shall explore the different options that
are available to price your product, skimming, penetration and value based
pricing will be some terms that I shall explore.